tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385595.post112547900770657096..comments2023-10-10T11:50:55.402+00:00Comments on Marcus Wood: Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385595.post-1126165686991466952005-09-08T07:48:00.000+00:002005-09-08T07:48:00.000+00:00You make fair points, and I don't want to give the...You make fair points, and I don't want to give the impression that I oppose Ken because of his age, what I am saying is that our opponents at the next election will exploit his age and especially the age gap between him and either Gordon Brown or, as I think is highly likely, Tony Blair who imo is going to find a reason to stay on 'one more time'. My main objection to Clarke is just that he was one of the main players in the internal warring during the late 1980's and early 1990's that did the party so much harm; he has a track record of putting 'Self' above 'Party' and that naturally makes me very wary.Marcus Woodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13540289778100132614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385595.post-1126124332044483572005-09-07T20:18:00.000+00:002005-09-07T20:18:00.000+00:00Winston Churchill was 80 when he stepped down as P...Winston Churchill was 80 when he stepped down as Prime Minister and Reagan was 78 when he finished his 2nd term as President. Both of these men were seen as more successful that many of their younger counterparts. I really think age is a smoke screen here.<BR/><BR/>I'm am 33 years old and I voted Tory once but a candidate rarely gets more votes just because they are younger than their opposition. The young that you are trying to attract aren't stupid. I suggest modernise your policies rather than your leader's age.<BR/><BR/>Would you suggest that all business leaders that are aged 65 or over should resign over the next 5 years?GaffaUKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04131264516005983331noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385595.post-1126081873549735592005-09-07T08:31:00.000+00:002005-09-07T08:31:00.000+00:00It's not just a question of Europe with Ken anymor...It's not just a question of Europe with Ken anymore. Europe is not the big issue it once was amongst Tories and as a result Ken could be in with a good chance this time.<BR/><BR/>But what would happen in 2009 in the lead-up to a General Election? The Labour Party would ruthlessly exploit the fact that Ken would be 75 at the end of that Parliament and all the talk would still be about 'who will the Tories elect to replace him' - a potentially disasterous distraction.Marcus Woodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13540289778100132614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385595.post-1126048421032987252005-09-06T23:13:00.000+00:002005-09-06T23:13:00.000+00:00I don't think dismissing Ken Clarke because he was...I don't think dismissing Ken Clarke because he was in the cabinet in the early 90s exludes him from being leader of the Conservatives. You wouldn't have Thatcher in 1979 as she was education secretary under Heath's troubled stay at No 10 in the early 70s. <BR/><BR/>The problem is that the Tory party has torn itself over Europe and despite being an effective minster and Chancellor - the Tories cannot forgive Clarke on his pro-Euro views. Meanwhile the country has moved on and the votes have gone elsewhere including mine. Vote another dullard if you wish to remain as an ineffective opposition.GaffaUKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04131264516005983331noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385595.post-1126020676457726982005-09-06T15:31:00.000+00:002005-09-06T15:31:00.000+00:00I wish I could agree, Malcom Rifkind is a nice man...I wish I could agree, Malcom Rifkind is a nice man (though a bit arrogant I think)but I stick to my view that he belongs to a past generation, he is too closely associated with John Majors Government.<BR/><BR/>I accept Cameron is a bit 'new' but he would have been in Parliament for ten years by the next election...<BR/><BR/>Davis has an unbroken track record of success in Westminster (hasn't really put a foot wrong so far) and has a business background. I know David best of all the candidates so am probably biased.<BR/><BR/>I just wish he wasn't labelled as a 'right winger'.Marcus Woodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13540289778100132614noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6385595.post-1125563469258285462005-09-01T08:31:00.000+00:002005-09-01T08:31:00.000+00:00I myself would like to see Rifkind given a go.Clar...I myself would like to see Rifkind given a go.<BR/>Clarke would have been the right answer in 2001, but that was because Rifkind wasn't there. Clarke wouldn't be a bad leader, and even Davis would be better than IDS (worse than useless) and Howard (who seemed to have decided to make the Tory Party the 'Nasty Party' for the last election).<BR/>I think Cameron needs a little more experience, and i'm not sure about Liam Fox.<BR/>Rifkind may have been there in the 1990's, but then so was Davis (a whip if I recall), so had been Howard and so had been IDS (even if all he had done was muck about). Hague didn't have a senior position in the 90's, but that didn't help him much either.<BR/>What the party needs is someone who knows what he/she wants to do, has a sense of direction and who has the clout to take on Blair and his successor - more importantly they have to have the ability to win power and then do something constructive with it.<BR/>I think Malcolm Rifkind is the best qualified of those who have said they will stand.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com